Why Patient Recall Is a Growth Lever
Reconnecting with lapsed patients through soft, asynchronous follow-up drives more durable growth than chasing new leads or spending more on ads.
Jared Aron
Show notes
Jared separates follow-up, which nurtures patients at every stage, from recall, which specifically brings lapsed patients back. Most clinics either skip recall or reduce it to a single call or email, and it rarely works.
He argues clinical quality is now table stakes, so experience is the real differentiator. Asynchronous, personal messages feel like a friend checking in, turn patients into champions, and drive word-of-mouth growth without more ad spend.
The episode also covers the shift from reactive to proactive engagement, why large providers can deliver five-star care alongside a broken patient experience, and why the future is paying for outcomes rather than software seats.
Key takeaways
- Recall is a subset of follow-up focused specifically on bringing lapsed patients back, and a single call or email is not enough.
- Some patients reactivate after 11 or 13 years away when a clinic follows up warmly, showing the relationship was dormant rather than dead.
- Asynchronous messaging lets patients respond in their own time and feels far less pushy than a phone call, which matters most in recall and follow-up.
- Clinical quality has become table stakes, so experience and relationship, what Jared calls solving for delight, are the real differentiators.
- As a provider scales, the difficulty of proactive patient management grows exponentially, and large hospitals often pair excellent care with a broken patient experience.
- Hiring a single coordinator cannot cover tens of thousands of patients, so that person needs technology that amplifies their reach.
“The patient journey is a bowl of spaghetti. It's not a straight line.”— Jared Aron
See how much revenue your clinic is leaking.
Coherent gives private clinics one patient relationship engine, recovering revenue lost at enquiry, recall and billing.