Healthcare AI Safety Gap · Don't break patients
    Peer-reviewed / official22 Aug 2026·EU / US

    AI radiology tools reach European patients long before US regulators clear them

    npj Digital Medicine: across 239 AI radiology devices, tools CE-marked first waited a median 17.5 months for FDA clearance — against 3.5 months the other way round.

    17.5 vs 3.5 months
    median lag to a second authorisation for CE-first vs FDA-first AI radiology tools

    What the research found

    Researchers analysed 239 AI-enabled radiology software devices listed in the European Health AI Register and FDA sources. Of these, 128 held a CE mark only, 95 were CE-marked before FDA clearance, and just 16 went the other way. Among dual-authorised devices, CE-first tools waited a median 17.5 months (IQR 8.0 to 35.5) for their second authorisation versus 3.5 months (IQR 1.0 to 11.3) for FDA-first tools, with radiograph-interpretation software waiting longest (hazard ratio 0.42). The authors describe a persistent transatlantic asymmetry and call for greater regulatory coordination and transparency.

    Why it matters for providers

    The same AI tool can be in routine European use for well over a year before a second regulator has examined it — so where a tool was cleared tells a provider almost as much about the scrutiny behind it as whether it was cleared at all.

    Original source
    npj Digital Medicine (University of Bern & Politecnico di Milano)
    Read the full report ↗
    Peer-reviewed or official source — the most reliable tier.